Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Sparks are Flying


Nicholas Sparks’ novels have been being made into movies for a very long time now. Six of his novels are currently movies and another one is in production now (The Lucky One) for all you Nicholas Sparks fans.Here is his website for more information. The story that I have chosen to discuss of him is the first movie of his I ever saw. Though I’ve seen most of them and enjoyed them all, the first one I saw has always meant something to me even before I knew it was based on a book by Nicholas Sparks. The movie would be, A Walk to Remember. I had never read a Nicholas Sparks novel before this just seen the movies so when I was trying to decide which one I’d like to read it felt like that natural choice being my favorite. My opinion, I like the movie way better than the book. There are several things in the movie that make the relationship between Jamie (Mandy Moore) and Landon (Shane West) reach much greater depths of love than the novel seemed to allow them too.

How Landon and Jamie end up spending time together: Landon Carter is thrust into Jamie’s world because he gets into trouble, his punishment is to participate in the school play, tutor on the weekends, and help clean the school. All of these things Jamie either participate in or he runs into her at. In the book Landon doesn’t get in trouble, he actually gets elected class president and continues to participate in things like the play because Jamie asks him to and he wants to be nice.

The first date: In the book his first date with Jamie is to a school dance that he only asked her to as a last resort. He couldn’t find anyone else to go with him. In the book he is basically a rider of the cool kid group. Although later in the book he does ask her dad to let him take her to dinner. In the movie there is no doubt he is one of the most popular kids in school and wouldn’t have any problem getting a date. His first date with her in the movie is romantic and he actually likes her when he asks her but must ask her father permission because she is not allowed to date.


Jamie’s List: One of the most important plots in the movie is Jamie’s list of things she wants to do in her life. A large part of their relationship is Landon helping to fulfill them. In the book there is no list, she just mentions once wanting to get married and have a large crowd there.

The story progression: In the book the story seems to drag on and on, it isn’t till the very end that the big realization (that I won’t reveal as not to spoil for people who haven’t read or seen it) happens and then it is very rushed. In the movie it is more spaced out and a lot of the story is still going on even after this realization.

The feeling behind the story: In my opinion the movie does a much better job of capturing all the feeling that this story possesses. Their love seems much stronger and well built in the movie. Their relationship is more unexpected which makes it more passionate. The book while yes they are in love doesn’t seem to have as much depth as the movie captures.

I probably wouldn’t recommend the book just because it really disappointed me. I have talked to people who said they liked it better, but more people have said that the movie and book just don’t compare. I want to read other of Sparks’ novels because I’ve heard he is really good, this book just did not live up to my expectations.

Here is the trailer for the film:



Enjoy!
(I take no credit for the photos or video in this post)

Monday, November 15, 2010

Anne Boleyn or Mary Boleyn?


The Other Boleyn Girl by Philippa Gregory tells the well known story of Anne Boleyn with a bit of a twist that is not so well known. There is another Boleyn girl, Mary, who is the first to win King Henry VIII’s affection. Henry takes Mary as a mistress after his first wife, Katherine of Aragon, fails to produce an heir for his throne. After Mary has fallen hard for the King in comes Anne dark and enchanting to steal him away from more than just her sister but also the Queen forever changing England. For more historical fiction by Gregory click here.

This is another much too large novel that film makers tried to cram into one movie. I didn’t realize this until after later, having seen the movie first and really enjoyed it I went and got the book. The book definitely put all the characters in the movie into a completely different light. Mary (Scarlett Johansson) in the book has two children, a boy and a girl, from her affair with the king. These children become the loves of her life after being pushed aside by her sister and the king. Her strong affection for them is the key to her family using her even more. In the movie she has one child, a boy, and basically immediately shipped away with the child no one in the family showing much concern for either of them. Mary’s detailed plot lines from the book after her and the king break up are chopped from the film.


Anne (Natalie Portman) in the book is much more evil than the film. Often times in the film one feels sorry for her and is rooting for her to overcome all the obstacles in her way to the top. The book though doesn’t sugar coat anything she does. Her actions are terrible and it makes sure that is known, making her much more hated in the book. Now Anne and her brother’s (Jim Sturgess) relationship is one altered in the adaptation as well. He is much more of a main character in the novel. In the film he tries to have an affair with his sister to produce an heir for the king but decides he cannot. In the book the two do have an affair and it results in a dreadful deformed miscarriage, plus he also has a gay affair in the book that is an important plot line but the movie never touches upon.

And finally King Henry (Eric Bana) is as well was made much more lovable in the movie than the book. In the movie he is an elegant, passionate, powerful king who stays handsome and fit the entire time. In the book he is a selfish, ignorant, childish king who by the time Anne really gets to have him is large and unattractive. I much prefer the Eric Bana king though instead of the more realistic version in the book. These are just some of the more important characters and how they were altered. There are some other characters as well that have plot lines in the book that weren’t touched upon for if they were also changed the character significantly. More or less the movie wanted to keep the eye candy appeal going the whole time. I enjoyed both versions this time I think, that could be though because I did see the movie first instead of second, so the book just kind of built upon a story I had already enjoyed.

Trailer:


Enjoy!

(I take no credit for the pictures or video used in this post)

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

The King's Window


Secret Window a film based off of one of Stephen King’s (view the master of horror’s site here) short stories titled, Secret Window, Secret Garden in the collection Four Past Midnight is probably one of my most favorite movies. It has my favorite actor, Johnny Depp, who portrays the main character of Mort Rainey with incredible skill. I saw the movie long before I ever read the short story and fell in love with it. The story is dark and twisted and unbelievably clever. Plus, wanting to be a writer myself I enjoyed the connection that the story had to the industry.

Secret Window is about an author by the name of Mort Rainey, who gets awakened to a pounding on his door one day. Upon answering it a man by the name of John Shooter introduces himself and accuses him of stealing one of his stories. Rainey compares the manuscripts and almost every word is the same. Shooter turns up time and again thrusting Rainey into a horrific nightmare. Shooter demands that he won’t stop until Rainey fixes his story, fixes the ending. Mean while Rainey already has personal issues he is dealing with, the break up between him and his wife, Amy.


After finishing the short story there were parts that I liked about both and part that I disliked about both. The dialogue in the book and movie are surprisingly similar. Hardly anything was changed with the things that the characters say when it transitioned to the big screen. The changes I did notice seemed to me like they would have been made to make the movie more suspenseful and at times more comedic as well. I noticed that in the book Rainey’s character talks to himself much more than he does in the film. I also noticed that in the book John Shooter calls more than he shows up, where as in the movie Shooter calls only once the rest of the encounters are in person. Both of these things I can see the benefit in changing. It wouldn’t be as interesting to just watch him get phone calls all the time.

I really didn’t like the ending in the book, it was completely different to that of the movie and I honestly thought the movie’s ending was amazing. The ending of the film is what made me like the story so much because I thought how it all came together was very clever. When I finished the short story and it was different I felt like part of the story had been ruined so it wasn’t as effective of a tale as it could have been.

Honestly though, book and movie are very similar besides the very, very end and some minor details that aren’t that important anyways. Which is good, for the most part I felt like I was actually just reading the movie I had grown so fond of. I can recommend them both, but my loyalty remains with the ending of the film version.

Here is the trailer:



Enjoy!!

Monday, November 1, 2010

A Love Hate Relationship


Yes, this week the books up for discussion is the Twilight series by Stephenie Meyer. A series that people either really love or hate with just about everything they have. I understand those of you who dislike it, and it is okay to voice your opinion that you don't like it and say why, but please no comments that are just insulting. This site is about critiquing not condemning. With that said lets begin.

I avoided the Twilight series for quite sometime simply because the hype about it was crazy. I knew so many people completely obsessed with these books and with all the praise the books were getting I assumed they would not live up to expectations. Finally though I gave into peer pressure and figured I'd see what the big deal was. I ended up enjoying them and read them all. I thought they were good books especially for the age group they target. People say she is a bad writer, but she's not writing for adults so the writing will be more simple.

For those of you who don't know much about Twilight and try to avoid it because of the craziness it brings along with it, I'll give you a little summary. The story is about a girl, Bella, who moves to Forks, Washington a town known for very little sunlight throughout the whole year to live with her father. She ends up meeting and falling in love with a vampire, Edward, who has a very strong desire to drink her blood. However, he and his family only drink the blood of animals not humans. Obviously this relationship just from that brief note has problems and this series follows these two throughout their issues while they try to not let the gulf between them tear them apart.


The films seem to be getting better as they go along. The first film was definitely rough, a lot of things in the novel could have been really neat with special effects. The director, Catherine Hardwicke, likes to limit the amount of technology she uses to enhance a film though. Some major changes in the movie happen mostly during Bella's period of learning about Edward and his life. The movie completely changes when Bella find's out he is a vampire. The movie also rushes the issue of what happens when he goes into the sunlight, he does not grab her and dart up a mountain to show her that he sparkles. The movie also rushes the meeting of Jacob, Bella's best friend. Those are a couple of the major changes from the first novel.

The second two books, New Moon and Eclipse obviously have some changes as well but t get into all them would make this a very long post. Basically these novels like Harry Potter are very large so information comes across very quickly in the movies because they don't have an endless amount of time. The movies really do get better as they go along though, I'll give them that.

I completely understand why people hate these books though. Most of the fans are completely wild and off the wall obsessed with these fictional characters it honestly is ridiculous. I get annoyed with hearing about it and I actually like the story. So there it is my notes on Twilight.

Here are a few videos that are funny, Robert Pattinson (Edward) and his silly fan's request that they need him to bite them:

David Letterman Clip


Access Hollywood Clip


And Tyra


Enjoy!

(I take no credit for any of the videos or pictures in this post)